<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Community:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/8" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/8</id>
  <updated>2026-06-22T12:44:36Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-06-22T12:44:36Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>ø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√ 1±ˆ¬±1  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬... ̧ ̃¢∂Ó¬  ̃±'«¬ı±√œ ’±√ ̇« – ¤fl¡ ø¬ıÀù≠ ̄∏Ì±Rfl¡ ’Ò... ̊ ̨Ú</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/521" />
    <author>
      <name>Baishya, Gobinda</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/521</id>
    <updated>2026-05-25T05:08:50Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: ø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√ 1±ˆ¬±1  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬... ̧ ̃¢∂Ó¬  ̃±'«¬ı±√œ ’±√ ̇« – ¤fl¡ ø¬ıÀù≠ ̄∏Ì±Rfl¡ ’Ò... ̊ ̨Ú
Authors: Baishya, Gobinda
Abstract: ’aÓ¬1øÌfl¡±&#xD;
õ∂ô¶±aÚ± –&#xD;
’ ̧ ̃1  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...- ̧—¶¥®øÓ¬ ’±1n∏ Ê√±Ó¬œ ̊ ̨ Ê√œaÚÕ ̆ ø ̊ ̧fl¡ ̆ ¬ı...øMêÀ ̊ ̨ ø¬ıøˆ¬iß  ̧ ̃ ̊ ̨Ó¬ ø¬ıøˆ¬iß&#xD;
¬ı1„√√øÌ ’±·¬ıÏ¬ˇ± ̋◊ ∆·ÀÂ√, Œ ̧ ̋◊ ̧fl¡ ̆ ¬ı...øMê1 øˆ¬Ó¬1Ó¬ ø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√ 1±ˆ¬±1 ¶ö±Ú ’Ú...Ó¬ ̃o ø¬ı ̄∏≈û&#xD;
1±ˆ¬± ̋◊√  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...- ̧—¶¥®øÓ¬1 Ê√·Ó¬‡Ú1  ̆·ÀÓ¬ ˆ¬±1Ó¬1 ¶§±ÒœÚÓ¬±  ̧—¢∂± ̃1 1ÌÀÓ¬±  ̧øSê ̊ ̨ˆ¬±Àa&#xD;
’— ̇¢∂ ̋√ Ì fl¡ø1øÂ√ ̆o ’±Àμ± ̆ÚÓ¬ ’— ̇¢∂ ̋√ Ì1 õ∂Ô ̃±a¶ö±Ó¬  ̃ ̋√√±R± ·±gœ1 ’ø ̋√√— ̧±  ̧Ó¬...±¢∂ ̋√ Ó¬&#xD;
Œ ̊±· ø√øÂ√ ̆  ̊ø√› ø¬ÛÂ√1 ø¬ÛÀÚ ŒÓ¬›“  ̧ ̇¶a ø¬ıõ≠aœ  ̧—¢∂± ̃1 ø¬ÛÀÚ Ï¬± ̆ ‡± ̊ ̨o ø¬ı ̄∏≈û 1±ˆ¬± ̋◊&#xD;
 ̧ ̃±Ê√‡ÚÓ¬ ‰¬ø ̆ ’ ̋√√± Œ ̇± ̄∏Ì ’±1n∏ Œ|Ìœ ∆¬ı ̄∏ ̃... Œ√ø‡  ̧ ̃±Ê√1 ¬Ûø1aÓ¬«Ú1 fl¡Ô± ø‰¬ôL± fl¡ø1øÂ√ ̆o&#xD;
 ̋◊—1±Ê√  ̇± ̧Ú ’±1n∏ Ó¬±1 ¬Û1aÓ¬«œ  ̧ ̃ ̊ ̨Ó¬ ˆ¬±1ÀÓ¬ ¶§±ÒœÚÓ¬±  ̆±ˆ¬ fl¡1±1 ø¬ÛÂ√ÀÓ¬±  ̧ ̃±Ê√Ó¬ Œ√‡±&#xD;
ø√ ̊ ̨±  ̧¬ı« ̋√ ±1± |ø ̃fl¡-¬ıÚ≈a± Œ|Ìœ1 Œ ̇± ̄∏Ì-¬ı=Ú± ̋◊ 1±ˆ¬±1  ̋√√+√ ̊ ̨fl¡ fl¡“¬Û± ̋◊ Ó≈¬ø ̆À ̆o 1±ˆ¬± ̋◊  ̧¬ı« ̋√ ±1±&#xD;
Œ|ÌœÀÈ¬±1  ̃≈øMê1 ¬ı±À¬ı fl¡± ̆«  ̃±'«, ¤Àe ̆‰ƒ¬, Œ ̆øÚÚ,  ̃±›-Œ‰¬-Ó≈¬„√√1 1‰¬Ú±1  ̆·ÀÓ¬ fl¡ø ̃Î◊¬øÚ©Ü1&#xD;
ˆ¬±¬ıÒ±1± ̧ ̃” ̋√ ·ˆ¬œ1ˆ¬±Àa ’Ò... ̊ ̨Ú fl¡ø1À ̆o 1±ˆ¬± ̋◊ ¤‡Ú Œˆ¬√±Àˆ¬√ ̋√ œÚ  ̧± ̃... ̧ ̃±Ê√ ·Ï¬ˇ±1  ̧—fl¡ä&#xD;
 ̆íÀ ̆o Ó¬»fl¡± ̆œÚ  ̧ ̃±Ê√Ó¬ ‰¬ø ̆ ’ ̋√√± Œ|ÌœÕ¬ı ̄∏ ̃..., fl‘¡ ̄∏fl¡-¬ıÚ≈a±, øÚÀ©Ûø ̄∏Ó¬ Œ|Ìœ1  ̃≈øMê1 ¬ı±À¬ı&#xD;
 ̃±'«, Œ ̆øÚÀÚ Œ√‡≈a± ̋◊ Œ ̊±a±  ̧± ̃...¬ı±√œ ¬ÛÀÔÀ ̋√√ ¤ ̋◊ Œ|ÌœÀÈ¬±1 õ∂fl‘¡Ó¬  ̃≈øMê1 ¬ÛÔ Œ√‡≈a±¬ı ¬Û±ø1¬ı&#xD;
¬ı≈ø ̆ ø¬ıù ́± ̧ fl¡ø1 ëˆ¬±1Ó¬œ ̊ ̨ ø¬ıõ≠aœ fl¡ø ̃Î◊¬øÚ©Ü ¬Û±øÈ¬«Ó¬í Œ ̊±·√±Ú fl¡ø1À ̆o  ̧—·Í¬ÚÓ¬ Œ ̊±·√±Ú&#xD;
fl¡ø1À ̊ ̨ ̋◊ ŒÓ¬›“ |ø ̃fl¡ ’±1n∏ fl‘¡ ̄∏fl¡1 ’øÒfl¡±11  ̋√√Àfl¡ ’±øÒ ̊ ̨±1 ’±Àμ± ̆ÚÓ¬ Ú±ø ̃ ¬Ûø1 ̆o&#xD;
¬Û1±ÒœÚ ˆ¬±1Ó¬Ó¬  ̋◊—1±Ê√ ’±1n∏ øfl¡Â≈√  ̧≈ø¬ıÒ±¬ı±√œ ˆ¬±1Ó¬œ ̊ ̨ ̋◊  ̋◊—1±Ê√1 Œ·± ̆± ̃œ fl¡ø1&#xD;
 ̧±Ò±1Ì Œ|Ìœ1  ̃±Ú≈ ̋√ ø‡øÚ1 ›¬Û1Ó¬ ’Ó¬...±‰¬±1 fl¡ø1øÂ√ ̆o ¤ ̋◊ ’Ó¬...±‰¬±1-Œ ̇± ̄∏Ì1 ¬Û1±  ̃≈øMê&#xD;
ø¬ı‰¬±ø1 ˆ¬±1Ó¬1  ̃±Ú≈À ̋√√ ¶§±ÒœÚÓ¬±  ̧—¢∂± ̃ fl¡ø1À ̆ øÍ¬Àfl¡ ̋◊√ , øfl¡c ¬Û1aÓ¬«œ  ̧ ̃ ̊ ̨Ó¬ ˆ¬±1ÀÓ¬ Œ ̊øÓ¬ ̊ ̨±&#xD;
 ̋◊—1±Ê√1 ¬Û1± ¶§±ÒœÚÓ¬±  ̆±ˆ¬ fl¡ø1À ̆ ŒÓ¬øÓ¬ ̊ ̨±›  ̧±Ò±1Ì Ê√Ú·Ì1 Œfl¡±ÀÚ±  ̆±ˆ¬ Ú ̋√√í ̆o ¶§±ÒœÚ&#xD;
ˆ¬±1Ó¬Ó¬  ̧¬ı« ̋√ ±1± Œ|ÌœÀÈ¬±1 ›¬Û1Ó¬ ¤Àfl¡ Ò1ÀÌ ̋◊ Œ ̇± ̄∏Ì ’±1y fl¡ø1À ̆ ÚÓ≈¬ÚÕfl¡ ·Ï¬ˇ ∆ ̆ Î¬◊Í¬±&#xD;
Ê√ø ̃√±1œ-¬Û≈“øÊ√¬ı±√œ Œ|ÌœÀÈ¬±Àao ˆ¬±1Ó¬1  ̃±Ú≈ ̋√ ø‡øÚÀ ̊ ̨ ø ̊ ’± ̇± ’±1n∏ ’±¶ö±À1 ¶§±ÒœÚÓ¬±  ̧—¢∂± ̃Ó¬&#xD;
Œ ̊±· ø√øÂ√ ̆ ¬ı±ô¶aÓ¬ Œ ̧ ̊ ̨± ∆ ̋√√ Ú≈øÍ¬ ̆o  ̧¬ı« ̋√ ±1± Œ|ÌœÀÈ¬±1 ›¬Û1Ó¬ Œ ̇± ̄∏Ì-øÚ¬ÛœÎ¬ˇÚ ‰¬ø ̆À ̊ ̨ ̋◊&#xD;
Ô±øfl¡ ̆o ¶§±ÒœÚÓ¬± õ∂±ø5À ̊ ̨  ̧±Ò±1Ì Ê√Ú ̧±Ò±1Ì1 ›¬Û1Ó¬  ̋◊ ̃±Ú ¬ıÂ√À1 fl¡ø1 ’ ̋√√± Œ ̇± ̄∏Ì1 ’ôL&#xD;
0.1¬Ûø1¬ı ¬ı≈ø ̆ ÚÓ≈¬Ú ‰¬1fl¡±11 ¬Û1± ’± ̇± fl¡ø1À ̆  ̊ø√› ˆ¬±1Ó¬1 |ø ̃fl¡-fl‘¡ ̄∏fl¡ Œ|Ìœ1 ’a¶ö±1&#xD;
Œfl¡±ÀÚ± ¬Ûø1aÓ¬«Ú Ú ̋√√í ̆o Œ√ ̇Ó¬ ’fl¡ ̆ é¬ ̃Ó¬±1À ̋√√ ¬ ̋√√ô¶±ôL1  ̋√√í ̆  ̧±Ò±1Ì  ̃±Ú≈ ̋√ 1 øfl¡c ≈√‡1&#xD;
›1 Ú¬Ûø1 ̆o ¶§±ÒœÚÓ¬± õ∂±ø51 õ∂Ô ̃ ’a¶ö±ÀÓ¬  ̧ ̃±Ê√‡Ú1 Œfl¡±ÀÚ± ¬Ûø1aÓ¬«Ú Œ√‡± Ú±¬Û± ̋◊√&#xD;
ø¬ı ̄∏≈û 1±ˆ¬±Àfl¡ ’±ø√ fl¡ø1 ’Ú...±Ú... ̧fl¡ ̆À1± ‰¬ø ̆Ó¬ ¬ı...a¶ö±1 õ∂øÓ¬ Œ ̃± ̋√√ ˆ¬—·  ̋√√í ̆o fl¡ø ̃Î◊¬øÚ©Ü&#xD;
1±ˆ¬± ̋◊  ̧± ̃...¬ı±œ√  ̧ ̃±Ê√ 1 õ∂øÓ¬á¬± ø¬ı‰¬±ø1øÂ√  ̆ o 1±ˆ¬± ̋◊ Œ ̇± ̄∏ Ì fl¡±1œ Ê√ ø  ̃√ ± 1- ̃ ̋√ √ ± Ê√ Ú ,&#xD;
¬Û≈“øÊ√¬ı±√œ ̧fl¡ ̆fl¡  ̧±aÒ±Ú¬ı±Ìœ qÚ±À ̆o fl‘¡ ̄∏fl¡-¬ıÚ≈a± ̧fl¡ ̆1 õ∂±¬Û... ’øÒfl¡±11 ¬ı±À¬ı ŒÓ¬›“ fl‘¡ ̄∏fl¡&#xD;
’±Àμ± ̆ÚÓ¬ Ú±ø ̃ ¬Ûø1 ̆o fl‘¡ ̄∏fl¡ ’±Àμ± ̆Ú1 Œù≠±·±Ú ’±øÂ√ ̆ ëÚ±„√√ ̆  ̊±1  ̃±øÈ¬ Ó¬±1ío&#xD;
’±Àμ± ̆Úfl¡±1œ ̧fl¡ ̆1 ø ̋√√— ̧±Rfl¡ fl¡± ̊« Sê ̃±Ó¬ ¬ı‘øX Œ¬Û±a±Ó¬ ‰¬1fl¡±À1  ̧—·Í¬ÚÀÈ¬± Œ¬ı-’± ̋◊Úœ&#xD;
Œ‚± ̄∏Ì± fl¡À1o 1±ˆ¬± ̋◊ ’Ú...±Ú... ̧fl¡ ̆1  ̆·Ó¬ ’±RÀ·±¬ÛÚ fl¡À1o 1±ˆ¬± ̋◊ ’±RÀ·±¬ÛÚ1 ¤ ̋◊&#xD;
 ̧ ̃ ̊ ̨ÀÂ√±a±fl¡ ’:±Ó¬¬ı± ̧ ¬ı≈ø ̆ÀÂ√o&#xD;
ø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√ 1±ˆ¬± ̋◊  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...1 ø¬ıøˆ¬iß ˆ¬±· ̧ ̃” ̋√ 1‰¬Ú± fl¡ø1øÂ√ ̆o ∆¬ÛÚÓ¬ ¬ı ̊ ̨ ̧Ó¬  ̃±'«¬ı±√1&#xD;
·ˆ¬œ1 ’Ò... ̊ ̨ÀÚ ŒÓ¬›“1  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...1 ›¬Û1Ó¬ õ∂ˆ¬±a Œ¬Û ̆± ̋◊øÂ√ ̆o ¬Û≈“øÊ√¬ı±√œ- ̧± ̃ôLÓ¬±øLafl¡  ̧ ̃±Ê√‡Ú1&#xD;
¬Û1±  ̧ ̃±Ê√Ó¬±øLafl¡  ̧± ̃... ̧ ̃±Ê√Õ ̆  ̧± ̃±øÊ√fl¡ Î◊¬M√√ 1Ì1 ¬ı±À¬ı 1±ˆ¬± ̋◊√ õ∂‰¬G ø¬ıõ≠a fl¡ø1øÂ√ ̆o Œ ̧ ̋◊√&#xD;
ø¬ıõ≠a1 õ∂øÓ¬Ù¬ ̆Ú ŒÓ¬›“1  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...1 ¬Û±ÀÓ¬ ¬Û±ÀÓ¬ ø¬ı√...± ̃±Úo&#xD;
·Àa ̄∏Ì±1 ø¬ı ̄∏ ̊ ̨ –&#xD;
’± ̃±1 ·Àa ̄∏Ì±1 ø¬ı ̄∏ ̊ ̨  ̋√√í ̆ ëø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√ 1±ˆ¬±1  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬... ̧ ̃¢∂Ó¬  ̃±'«¬ı±√œ ’±√ ̇« – ¤fl¡&#xD;
ø¬ıÀù≠ ̄∏Ì±Rfl¡ ’Ò... ̊ ̨Úío ø¬ı ̄∏ ̊ ̨¬ıd1  ̆·Ó¬  ̧—·øÓ¬ 1±ø‡ ø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√ 1±ˆ¬±1  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...Ó¬  ̃±'«œ ̊ ̨&#xD;
’±√ ̇«1  ̆·Ó¬ Ê√øÎ¬ˇÓ¬ ø√ ̇ ̧ ̃” ̋√ ¢∂Lö‡øÚÓ¬ ’±À ̆±‰¬Ú± fl¡1±  ̋√√í¬ıo ø¬ı ̄∏≈û 1±ˆ¬± ̋◊  ̃±'«¬ı±√1  ̆·Ó¬&#xD;
Ê√øÎ¬ˇÓ¬ ø¬ıøˆ¬iß ¢∂Lö ·ˆ¬œ1ˆ¬±Àa ’Ò... ̊ ̨Ú fl¡ø1øÂ√ ̆o ŒÓ¬›“1 ’øÒfl¡ ̧—‡...fl¡ 1‰¬Ú±Ó¬  ̋◊ ̊ ̨±1 õ∂ˆ¬±a&#xD;
¬Û1± Œ√‡±  ̊± ̊ ̨o 1±ˆ¬±1  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...Ó¬  ̧¬ı« ̧±Ò±1Ì Ê√Ú·Ì1 Œ ̇± ̄∏Ì-øÚ¬ÛœÎ¬ˇÚ, ¬ı=Ú±, ’Ô«ÕÚøÓ¬fl¡-&#xD;
1±Ê√ÕÚøÓ¬fl¡ˆ¬±Àa Œ ̇± ̄∏Ì, ’Ó¬...±‰¬±1, ¬Û≈“øÊ√¬ı±√  ̧± ̃ôLÓ¬±øLafl¡ ¬ı...a¶ö±1 ø¬ıÀ1±øÒÓ¬± fl¡ø1ÀÂ√o&#xD;
ø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√ 1±ˆ¬± ̋◊ ŒÓ¬›“1  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...  ̧ ̃¢∂Ó¬ øfl¡√À1  ̃±'«¬ı±œ√ √ ̇«Ú1 õ∂À ̊ ̨±· fl¡ø1ÀÂ√ ’±1n∏&#xD;
¤ ̋◊√ √ ̇«ÀÚ ŒÓ¬›“1  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬... ̧ ̃¢∂fl¡ øfl¡ ÚÓ≈¬ÚQ1 õ∂ ̧—·À1  ̧ ̃±¬ı‘Ó¬ fl¡ø1ÀÂ√o Ó¬±Àfl¡ ̋◊ ’± ̃±1&#xD;
·Àa ̄∏Ì±-¢∂LöÓ¬ Œ ̧ ̋◊√ ø¬ı ̄∏À ̊ ̨ ’±À ̆±‰¬Ú± fl¡ø1¬ıÕ ̆ õ∂ ̊P fl¡1± ∆ ̋√√ÀÂ√o&#xD;
0.2·Àa ̄∏Ì±1 Î◊¬ÀV ̇... ’±1n∏ Ó¬±»¬Û ̊« –&#xD;
·Àa ̄∏Ì± fl¡± ̊« ̋◊  ̧√± ̊ ̨ ÚÓ≈¬Ú1  ̧Ày√ ø√À ̊ ̨o ¤È¬± Î◊¬ÀV ̇... ’±·Ó¬ 1±ø‡À ̊ ̨ ̋◊ ¤ ̋◊ fl¡± ̊«Ó¬&#xD;
’±·¬ıÏ¬ˇ±  ̋√√ ̊ ̨o ·Àa ̄∏Ì±1  ̆é¬... øfl¡ ¤ ̋◊ ø¬ı ̄∏À ̊ ̨ ÚÀ·Ú  ̇ ̋◊fl¡œ ̊ ̨± ̋◊ ø√ ̊ ̨±  ̃ôL¬ı...øÈ¬ Î◊¬À~‡À ̊±·...&#xD;
ëë·Àa ̄∏Ì±1 ‚± ̋◊  ̆é¬... ̋◊  ̋√√í ̆ Œfl¡±ÀÚ± ¤È¬± ø¬ı ̄∏ ̊ ̨  ̧•ÛÀfl¡«  ̧Ó¬... ’Ài§ ̄∏Ì fl¡1± ’±1n∏ Ó¬±1 ¡Z±1±&#xD;
ø¬ı ̄∏ ̊ ̨ÀÈ¬±  ̧•ÛÀfl¡« ÚÓ≈¬Ú :±Ú, Ó¬Ô... ’±1n∏ ø ̧X±ôL ’±·¬ıÀÏ¬ˇ±a±oíí [ ̇ ̋◊fl¡œ ̊ ̨±, ·Àa ̄∏Ì± ¬ÛXøÓ¬&#xD;
¬Ûø1‰¬ ̊ ̨, ¬Û‘. 4]o ø¬ı ̄∏ ̊ ̨øÈ¬ ’Ò... ̊ ̨Ú fl¡ø1 ø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√ 1±ˆ¬±1 1‰¬Ú± ̧ ̃” ̋√ Ó¬  ̃±'«¬ı±√œ √ ̇«Ú øfl¡√À1&#xD;
õ∂fl¡±ø ̇Ó¬ ∆ ̋√√ÀÂ√ Œ ̧ ̊ ̨± Î◊¬Àij±ø‰¬Ó¬ fl¡1± ̋◊ ’± ̃±1 ·Àa ̄∏Ì±1 ‚± ̋◊ Î◊¬ÀV ̇...o&#xD;
 ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...  ̧ ̃¢∂Ó¬  ̃±'«¬ı±√œ √ ̇«Ú1 õ∂fl¡±À ̇ Œ ̊ ø¬ı ̄≈û 1±ˆ¬±1 ¬ı...øMê√·Ó¬ Ê√œaÚÀfl¡± õ∂¬ı≈X&#xD;
fl¡ø1øÂ√ ̆ Œ ̧ ̋◊√  ̧Ó¬...1 ’Ài§ ̄∏ÀÌ± ¤ ̋◊√ ·Àa ̄∏Ì±1 ø¬ıÀ ̇ ̄∏ Ó¬±»¬Û ̊«o  ̧ ̃ ̊ ̨  ̧ ̆øÚ  ̋√√ ̊ ̨o ëÚ ̆  ̃À1,&#xD;
·Ê√±ø ̆ › ̆± ̊ ̨oí ø¬ı ̄≈û 1±ˆ¬± ’±øÊ√ fl¡±ø ̊ ̨fl¡ˆ¬±Àa Ú± ̋◊√ , øfl¡c ŒÓ¬›“1  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...Ó¬ õ∂øÓ¬Ù¬ø ̆Ó¬&#xD;
 ̃±'«¬ı±√œ Ò±1Ì±1 ’Ò... ̊ ̨Ú Œ ̊ ’±øÊ√›  ̧ ̃±Ê√Ó¬  ̧ ̃Ó¬±1 ·Ê√±ø ̆ Œ ̃ ̆±1 ¬ı±À¬ı ’Ú...Ó¬ ̃ õ∂ ̧—·1+À¬Û&#xD;
ø¬ıÀ¬ıø‰¬Ó¬ Œ ̧ ̋◊√  ̧Ó¬...1 Ó¬±»¬Û ̊« ¤ ̋◊√ ·Àa ̄∏Ì± ̋◊√ ¬ı ̋√√Ú fl¡ø1¬ı ¬ı≈ø ̆ ’± ̇± fl¡1± ∆ ̋√√ÀÂ√o&#xD;
ø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√ 1±ˆ¬±1 ø¬ı ̇± ̆  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...1±øÊ√1 ø¬ıøˆ¬iß ø√ ̇  ̧•ÛÀfl¡« ¬ı1 Œ¬ıøÂ√ ’Ò... ̊ ̨Ú&#xD;
Œ ̋√√±a± Ú± ̋◊o ø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√ 1±ˆ¬±1 Ê√œaÚ ’±1n∏  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...1±øÊ√fl¡ ∆ ̆  ̃±S øÓ¬øÚ·1±fl¡œ ·Àa ̄Àfl¡&#xD;
·Àa ̄∏Ì±-¢∂Lö õ∂dÓ¬ fl¡ø1ÀÂ√o Œ ̧ ̋◊Àfl¡ ̋◊‡Ú ∆ ̋√√ÀÂ√ñ Œ ̋√√ ̃ ̆Ó¬± Œ√aœ1 ëø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√ 1±ˆ¬± –&#xD;
Ê√œaÚ ’±1n∏ fl¡ ̃«í [&amp;a± ̋√√±È¬œ ø¬ıù ́ø¬ı√...± ̆ ̊ ̨, 2000], √œø5 ¬ı1± ëø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√ 1±ˆ¬±1 1‰¬Ú±1±øÊ√Ó¬&#xD;
Œ ̆±fl¡- ̧±—¶¥®øÓ¬fl¡ Î◊¬¬Û±√±Ú – ø¬ıÀù≠ ̄∏Ì±Rfl¡ ’Ò... ̊ ̨Úí [&amp;a± ̋√√±È¬œ ø¬ıù ́ø¬ı√...± ̆ ̊ ̨, Œ ̆±fl¡- ̧—¶¥®øÓ¬&#xD;
ø¬ıˆ¬±·, 2003] ’±1n∏ ø¬ıÊ√ ̊ ̨± ¬ıÎ¬ˇ±1 ëø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√ 1±ˆ¬±1  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...1 ˆ¬± ̄∏± – ¤øÈ¬ ’Ò... ̊ ̨Úí&#xD;
[&amp;a± ̋√√±È¬œ ø¬ıù ́ø¬ı√...± ̆ ̊ ̨, ’±Ò≈øÚfl¡ ˆ¬±1Ó¬œ ̊ ̨ ˆ¬± ̄∏± ø¬ıˆ¬±·, 2015]o ø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√ 1±ˆ¬±&#xD;
¬ı...øMêÊ√Ú1 ø¬ı ̄∏À ̊ ̨ ¬ıUÀÓ¬± ’±À ̆±‰¬Ú± ∆ ̋√√ÀÂ√ øfl¡c ŒÓ¬›“1  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...Ó¬  ̃±'«¬ı±√œ ¬ı±  ̧—¢∂± ̃œ&#xD;
√ ̇«Ú  ̧•ÛÀfl¡« ¬ı1 ø¬ıÀ ̇ ̄∏ ’±À ̆±‰¬Ú± Œ ̋√√±a± Ú± ̋◊o Œ ̧À ̊ ̨À ̋√√ ŒÓ¬›“1  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...  ̧ ̃¢∂Ó¬  ̃±'«œ ̊ ̨&#xD;
√ ̇«Ú øfl¡√À1 õ∂øÓ¬Ù¬ø ̆Ó¬ ∆ ̋√√ÀÂ√ ¬Û1œé¬± fl¡ø1 Œ‰¬±a±1 õ∂À ̊ ̨±Ê√Ú ’±ÀÂ√o ¤ ̋◊À¬ı±1 fl¡Ô±1 õ∂øÓ¬&#xD;
 ̆é¬... 1±ø‡ ·Àa ̄∏Ì±1 ø¬ı ̄∏ ̊ ̨ÀÈ¬±Àa  ̊±ÀÓ¬ ’Ò... ̊ ̨Ú1Ó¬ ¬ı...øMê1 ø‰¬ôL±Ò±1Ó¬ õ∂ˆ¬±a Œ¬Û ̆±¬ı ¬Û±À1&#xD;
Œ ̧ ̋◊ fl¡Ô±1 õ∂øÓ¬  ̆é¬... 1±ø‡À ̊ ̨ ̋◊ ¤ ̋◊ ·Àa ̄∏Ì±1 õ∂À ̊ ̨±Ê√Úœ ̊ ̨Ó¬± ’Ú≈ˆ¬a fl¡1± ∆ ̋√√ÀÂ√o ’± ̃±1&#xD;
 ̧œø ̃Ó¬ :±Ú ’±1n∏ ’Ò... ̊ ̨Ú1 Œ ̊±À·ø√ ø ̊ ̃±Úø‡øÚ  ̧ya ∆ ̋√√ÀÂ√ Œ ̧ ̋◊ø‡øÚÀ ̋√√ ’±À ̆±‰¬Ú± fl¡ø1¬ıÕ ̆&#xD;
0.3õ∂ ̊ ̨± ̧ fl¡ø1ÀÂ√±o ¤ ̋◊ ø¬ı ̄∏ ̊ ̨øÈ¬1 ›¬Û1Ó¬ ·Àa ̄∏Ì±1 ’±1n∏ ’øÒfl¡  ̧≈À ̊±· ’±ÀÂ√o ¬Û1aÓ¬«œ ·Àa ̄∏fl¡1&#xD;
¬ı±À¬ı ’±ø ̃ ¬ı±È¬ 1±ø‡ ÔíÀ ̆±o&#xD;
·Àa ̄∏Ì±1 ¬Ûø1 ̧1 –&#xD;
¤ ̋◊√ fl¡Ô± ¬¬Û”¬ı«ÀÓ¬ ̋◊√ Œfl¡±a± ∆ ̋√√ÀÂ√ Œ ̊ ∆¬ÛÚÓ¬ ô¶1Ó¬  ̃±'«¬ı±À√ ̋◊√ ∆ ̋√√ ¬Ûø1øÂ√ ̆ ø¬ı ̄≈û&#xD;
1±ˆ¬±1  ̧—¢∂± ̃œ  ̧M√√±o Œ ̧ ̋◊√  ̧M√√± ̋◊√ ŒÓ¬›“1  ̃Ú,  ̃øô¶©®, ø¬ıÀ¬ıfl¡, ’±R± ’±1n∏  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...fl¡ ¤ÀÚˆ¬±Àa&#xD;
õ∂ˆ¬±a±øi§Ó¬ fl¡ø1øÂ√ ̆ Œ ̊ ŒÓ¬›“1 õ∂± ̊ ̨À¬ı±1  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...ÀÓ¬ ̋◊√  ̃±'«¬ı±√œ √ ̇«Ú1 ¶£¬≈1Ì ‚È¬± Œ√‡±  ̊± ̊ ̨o&#xD;
Œ ̧ ̋◊√ ¬ı≈ø ̆À ̊ ̨ ̋◊√ ŒÓ¬›“ Œ ̊ ¤ ̋◊√ √ ̇«Ú1 øÂ√øÈ¬fl¡øÌ ÚÔfl¡± Œfl¡±ÀÚ±Ò1Ì1  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬... ̋◊√ 1‰¬Ú± fl¡1± Ú±øÂ√ ̆&#xD;
ŒÓ¬ÀÚ fl¡Ô±› Ú ̋√√ ̊ ̨o ’± ̃±1 ·Àa ̄∏Ì±Ó¬ Œ ̧ ̋◊√ ø‡øÚ  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...fl¡ ¬ı±√ ø√ ̊ ̨± ∆ ̋√√ÀÂ√o  ̃±'«¬ı±√œ √ ̇«ÀÚÀ1&#xD;
ø¬ıÀ¬ıø‰¬Ó¬ ŒÓ¬›“1  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...  ̧ ̃¢∂1 õ∂ ̧—· ø¬ı‰¬±1Ó¬À ̋√√ ’± ̃±1 ¤ ̋◊√ ·Àa ̄∏Ì±1 Î¬◊ÀV ̇...o Ó¬≈√¬Ûø1&#xD;
øÚø«√©Ü  ̧ ̃ ̊ ̨ ’±1n∏ fl¡À ̆a11 øˆ¬Ó¬1Ó¬ ·Àa ̄∏Ì± fl¡± ̊«fl¡  ̧œ ̃±¬ıX 1±ø‡¬ı ̆·œ ̊ ̨± Œ ̋√√±a± Œ ̋√√Ó≈¬Àfl¡›&#xD;
Œ ̧ ̋◊√ ø‡øÚ 1‰¬Ú±fl¡  ̋◊√  ̊ ̨±Ó¬ ¬ı±√ ø√ 1‡± ∆ ̋√√ÀÂ√o&#xD;
·Àa ̄∏Ì± ¬ÛXøÓ¬ –&#xD;
·Àa ̄∏Ì± ∆ ̋√√ÀÂ√ ’Ú≈ ̧g±Ú fl¡± ̊«o øfl¡c ¤ ̋◊ ’Ú≈ ̧g±Ú fl¡ø1¬ıÕ ̆  ̋√√íÀ ̆ õ∂Ì± ̆œ¬ıXˆ¬±Àa&#xD;
’±·¬ı±øÏ¬ˇ¬ı  ̆±ø·¬ı ŒÓ¬øÓ¬ ̊ ̨±À ̋√√ ·Àa ̄∏Ì±1 fl¡± ̊«  ̧≈- ̇‘—‡ ̆ˆ¬±Àa ¬Ûø1‰¬±ø ̆Ó¬  ̋√√í¬ıo ’± ̃±1 ¤ ̋◊&#xD;
’Ò... ̊ ̨Ú1 ¬ı±À¬ı  ̃” ̆Ó¬– ø¬ıÀù≠ ̄∏Ì±Rfl¡ ¬ÛXøÓ¬1  ̆·ÀÓ¬ ¬ıÌ«Ú±Rfl¡ ¬ÛXøÓ¬› ¢∂ ̋√ Ì fl¡1± ∆ ̋√√ÀÂ√o&#xD;
·Àa ̄∏Ì±-¢∂Lö1  ̧”SøÚÀ√« ̇, õ∂ ̧—·ÀÈ¬±fl¡±, ¢∂Lö¬Û?œ ’±1n∏ ’±Ú ’±Ú≈ ̄∏—ø·fl¡ õ∂À ̊ ̨±Ê√ÚÓ¬ MLA&#xD;
Hand Book for Writers of Research Paper 1  ̧5 ̃  ̧—¶®1Ì1 ÚœøÓ¬ ’a ̆•§Ú fl¡1±&#xD;
∆ ̋√√ÀÂ√o õ∂ ̧—· ŒÈ¬±fl¡±1 ’Ú≈¬ı±√À¬ı±1 ·Àa ̄∏Àfl¡ øÚÀÊ√ ̋◊√ fl¡ø1ÀÂ√o  ̋◊√  ̊ ̨±Ó¬ ’Ú≈¬ı±√À¬ı±1 Œfl¡a ̆ ·Àa ̄∏Ì±1&#xD;
‡±øÓ¬1Ó¬À ̋√√ fl¡1± ∆ ̋√√ÀÂ√o&#xD;
·Àa ̄∏Ì±1  ̧ ̃ ̆ –&#xD;
·Àa ̄∏Ì±-¢∂Lö‡ÚÓ¬  ̃≈‡...  ̧ ̃ ̆ ø ̋√√‰¬±À¬Û 1±ˆ¬± 1‰¬Ú±a ̆œ õ∂fl¡± ̇Ú  ̧—‚ ̋◊ õ∂fl¡± ̇ fl¡1±&#xD;
ëø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√ 1±ˆ¬± 1‰¬Ú±  ̧y±1í [1 ̃ ‡G] ’±1n∏ ëø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√ 1±ˆ¬± 1‰¬Ú±  ̧y±1í [2 ̊ ̨ ‡G]&#xD;
0.4¢∂ ̋√ Ì fl¡1± ∆ ̋√√ÀÂ√o Œ·ÃÌ  ̧ ̃ ̆ ø ̋√√‰¬±À¬Û ’Ú...±Ú... 1‰¬Ú±1±øÊ√, ø¬ıøˆ¬iß ¢∂Lö, ¶ú‘øÓ¬¢∂Lö, ’±À ̆±‰¬Úœ,&#xD;
¬ı±Ó¬ø1 fl¡±fl¡Ó¬, ø¬ıøˆ¬iß õ∂± ̧—ø·fl¡ ¢∂Lö1  ̧ ̋√√± ̊ ̨ Œ ̆±a± ∆ ̋√√ÀÂ√o ·Àa ̄∏Ì± ¢∂Lö1 ’±À ̆±fl¡ø‰¬SÀfl¡ ̋◊√ ‡Ú&#xD;
 ̋◊√ ∞I◊±1ÀÚÈ¬1 ¬Û1± ¢∂ ̋√ Ì fl¡1± ∆ ̋√√ÀÂ√o  ̆·ÀÓ¬ øfl¡Â≈√ ̧—‡...fl¡ Œ ̃±¬ı± ̋◊√  ̆1 Ê√ø1 ̊ ̨ÀÓ¬ ŒÓ¬± ̆± ∆ ̋√√ÀÂ√o&#xD;
 ̧ ̃ ̆ ̧ ̃” ̋√  ̧—¢∂ ̋√ fl¡1±1 Œé¬SÓ¬ ø¬ıøˆ¬iß ¬Û≈øÔˆ¬“Î¬ˇ± ̆, ’Ú≈á¬±Ú, õ∂øÓ¬á¬±Ú, ø¬ıÀ ̇ ̄∏ˆ¬±Àa ¬ıÀÎ¬ˇ±À ̆G&#xD;
ø¬ıù ́ø¬ı√...± ̆ ̊ ̨1 ¬ÛΩ|œ  ̃√±1± ̃ ¬ıËp¡ Œfl¡fœ ̊ ̨ ¬Û≈øÔˆ¬“Î¬ˇ± ̆, Œfl¡±fl¡1±Á¬±1 øÊ√ ̆± ¬Û≈øÔˆ¬“Î¬ˇ± ̆, Ê√ÚÓ¬±&#xD;
 ̃ ̋√√±ø¬ı√...± ̆ ̊ ̨1 ¬Û≈øÔˆ¬“Î¬ˇ± ̆, ¬ı„√√± ̋◊·“±› øÊ√ ̆± ¬Û≈øÔˆ¬“Î¬ˇ± ̆, ¬ı1À¬ÛÈ¬± øÊ√ ̆± ¬Û≈øÔˆ¬“Î¬ˇ± ̆,  ̃±Òa&#xD;
Œ‰¬ÃÒ≈1œ  ̃ ̋√√±ø¬ı√...± ̆ ̊ ̨ ¬Û≈øÔˆ¬“Î¬ˇ± ̆, ¬ı1À¬ÛÈ¬±- ̋√√±Î◊¬ ̆œ  ̃ ̋√√±ø¬ı√...± ̆ ̊ ̨1 ¬Û≈øÔˆ¬“Î¬ˇ± ̆, Ú ̆¬ı±1œ øÊ√ ̆±&#xD;
¬Û≈øÔˆ¬“Î¬ˇ± ̆, &amp;a± ̋√√±È¬œ ø¬ıù ́ø¬ı√...± ̆ ̊ ̨1 fl‘¡ ̄∏ûfl¡±ôL  ̧øμÕfl¡ ¬Û≈øÔˆ¬“Î¬ˇ± ̆, &amp;a± ̋√√±È¬œ øÊ√ ̆± ¬Û≈øÔˆ¬“Î¬ˇ± ̆,&#xD;
Úμ Ó¬± ̆≈fl¡√±1 Ù¬±Î◊¬ÀG‰¬Ú, øÎ¬¬ıËn∏·Î¬ˇ ø¬ıù ́ø¬ı√...± ̆ ̊ ̨1  ̆ÑœÚ±Ô Œ¬ıÊ√¬ı1n∏a± Œfl¡fœ ̊ ̨ ¬Û≈øÔˆ¬“Î¬ˇ± ̆&#xD;
’±1n∏ ’± ̃±1 ·Àa ̄∏Ì± &amp;1n∏ ‰≈¬ ̃œ fl¡ø ̆Ó¬±1 ¬ı...øMê√·Ó¬ˆ¬±Àa  ̧—·‘ ̋√ œÓ¬ ¢∂Lö øfl¡Â≈√ø‡øÚÀ1±  ̧ ̋√√± ̊ ̨&#xD;
Œ ̆±a± ∆ ̋√√ÀÂ√o Œfl¡ ̋◊√ ¬ı±·1±fl¡œ› ø¬ı: ¬ı...øMê√1 ∆ ̧ÀÓ¬ Œ ̋√√±a± ’±À ̆±‰¬Ú±-ø¬ıÀ ̆±‰¬Ú± ̋◊√ › ’± ̃±1&#xD;
·Àa ̄∏Ì± fl¡ ̃«Ó¬ ø¬ıÀ ̇ ̄∏  ̧ ̋√√± ̊ ̨ ’±·¬ıÏ¬ˇ± ̋◊√ ÀÂ√o&#xD;
¬Û”¬ı«fl‘¡Ó¬  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...1 ’Ò... ̊ ̨Ú –&#xD;
’± ̃±1 õ∂ô¶±øaÓ¬ ·Àa ̄∏Ì±-¢∂Lö  ̧•ÛÀfl«¡ fl¡1± ¬Û”¬ı«fl‘¡Ó¬ ’Ò... ̊ ̨ÚÓ¬ øÚÀ•ß±Mê√ ¢∂Lö ̧ ̃” ̋√&#xD;
Œ¬Û± ̋√√1Õ ̆ ’±ø ̋√√ÀÂ√o&#xD;
ø¬Û¤ ̋◊‰¬. øÎ¬. øÎ¬¢∂œ1 ¬ı±À¬ı &amp;a± ̋√√±È¬œ ø¬ıù ́ø¬ı√...± ̆ ̊ ̨1 ’ ̧ ̃œ ̊ ̨± ø¬ıˆ¬±·Ó¬ √±ø‡ ̆ fl¡1±&#xD;
Œ ̋√√ ̃ ̆Ó¬± Œ√aœ1 ëø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√ 1±ˆ¬± – Ê√œaÚ ’±1n∏ fl¡ ̃«í  ̇œ ̄∏«fl¡ ·Àa ̄∏Ì±-¢∂LöÓ¬ ø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√&#xD;
1±ˆ¬±1 Ê√œaÚ ’±1n∏  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...  ̧•ÛÀfl¡« ’±À ̆±‰¬Ú± fl¡1± ∆ ̋√√ÀÂ√o&#xD;
ø¬Û¤ ̋◊‰¬. øÎ¬. øÎ¬¢∂œ1 ¬ı±À¬ı &amp;a± ̋√√±È¬œ ø¬ıù ́ø¬ı√...± ̆ ̊ ̨1 Œ ̆±fl¡- ̧—¶¥®øÓ¬ ø¬ıˆ¬±·Ó¬ √±ø‡ ̆&#xD;
fl¡1± √œø5 ¬ı1±1 ëø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√ 1±ˆ¬±1 1‰¬Ú±1±øÊ√Ó¬ Œ ̆±fl¡  ̧±—¶¥®øÓ¬fl¡ Î◊¬¬Û±√±Úí  ̇œ ̄∏«fl¡ ·Àa ̄∏Ì±&#xD;
¢∂LöÓ¬ ø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√ 1±ˆ¬±1 1‰¬Ú±Ó¬ Œ ̆±fl¡  ̧—¶¥®øÓ¬1 ’—· ¬ı±ø‰¬fl¡ fl¡ ̆±, Œˆ¬ÃøÓ¬fl¡  ̧—¶¥®øÓ¬1 Î◊¬¬Û±√±Ú,&#xD;
Œ ̆±fl¡±‰¬11 õ∂À ̊ ̨±·  ̧•ÛÀfl¡« ’±À ̆±‰¬Ú± fl¡1± ∆ ̋√√ÀÂ√o &amp;a± ̋√√±È¬œ ø¬ıù ́ø¬ı√...± ̆ ̊ ̨1 ’±Ò≈øÚfl¡ ˆ¬±1Ó¬œ ̊ ̨&#xD;
ˆ¬± ̄∏± ø¬ıˆ¬±·Ó¬ √±ø‡ ̆ fl¡1± ø¬ıÊ√ ̊ ̨± ¬ıÎ¬ˇ±1 ëø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√ 1±ˆ¬±1  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...1 ˆ¬± ̄∏± – ¤øÈ¬ ’Ò... ̊ ̨Úí&#xD;
 ̇œ ̄∏«fl¡ ·Àa ̄∏Ì±-¢∂LöÓ¬ ø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√ 1±ˆ¬±1 1‰¬Ú±Ó¬ õ∂À ̊ ̨±· Œ ̋√√±a± ˆ¬± ̄∏±, ÒıøÚÓ¬N, 1+¬ÛÓ¬N,  ̇sÓ¬N,&#xD;
0.5¬ı±fl¡...Ó¬N, Â√μ, ’ ̆—fl¡±11 õ∂À ̊ ̨±·,  ̧ ̃±Ê√ ˆ¬± ̄∏±Õ¬ı:±øÚfl¡1 ø¬ıøˆ¬iß ø√ ̇ ̧ ̃” ̋√ 1 ø¬ı ̄∏À ̊ ̨ ’±À ̆±‰¬Ú±&#xD;
fl¡ø1ÀÂ√o ø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√ 1±ˆ¬±1  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬... ’Ò... ̊ ̨Ú1 Œé¬S‡Ú ’øÓ¬Àfl¡ ¬ı ̋√√ ̆o øfl¡c Œ ̧ ̋◊ ’Ú≈¬Û±ÀÓ¬&#xD;
ŒÓ¬›“1 1‰¬Ú±  ̧ ̃¢∂1¬ ¬ıUÀÓ¬± &amp;1n∏Q¬Û”Ì« ø√ ̇1 ’Ò... ̊ ̨Ú ¤øÓ¬ ̊ ̨±Õ ̆Àfl¡ Œ ̋√√±a± Ú± ̋◊o ’ ̧ ̃1 Œ ̆‡fl¡&#xD;
Œ·±á¬œ1 øˆ¬Ó¬1Ó¬ Œfl¡ ̋◊·1±fl¡œ ̃±ÀÚ ø¬ı ̄∏≈û 1±ˆ¬±1 Ê√œaÚ ’±1n∏  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...  ̧•Ûfl¡«Ó¬ Œfl¡ ̋◊√ ‡Ú ̃±Ú&#xD;
¢∂Lö õ∂fl¡± ̇ fl¡ø1ÀÂ√o ŒÓ¬ÀÚ øfl¡Â≈√ ¢∂Lö  ̋√√í ̆ ñ&#xD;
 ̋√√œÀ1Ì Œ·± ̋√√“± ̋◊1  ̧•Û±√Ú±Ó¬ õ∂fl¡± ̇ Œ¬Û±a± ë∆ ̧øÚfl¡ ø ̇äœ ø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√ 1±ˆ¬±í ¢∂Lö‡ÚÓ¬&#xD;
1±ˆ¬±  ̧•Ûfl¡«œ ̊ ̨ Œfl¡ ̋◊√ È¬± ̃±Ú ’±À ̆±‰¬Ú± Œ¬Û±a±  ̊± ̊ ̨o  ̧” ̊«...  ̋√√±Ê√ø1fl¡±1  ̃≈‡...  ̧•Û±√Ú±Ó¬ õ∂fl¡± ̇&#xD;
Œ¬Û±a± ëøˆ¬ißÊ√Ú1 ‘√ø©ÜÓ¬ ø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√ 1±ˆ¬±í  ̇œ ̄∏«fl¡ ¢∂Lö‡ÚÓ¬ Œfl¡ ̋◊√ ¬ı±·1±fl¡œ› Œ ̆‡Àfl¡ 1±ˆ¬±1&#xD;
 ̧± ̃±øÊ√fl¡,  ̧±ø ̋√√øÓ¬...fl¡, 1±Ê√ÕÚøÓ¬fl¡ ’±ø√ ø¬ıøˆ¬iß ø√ ̇1 ø¬ı ̄∏À ̊ ̨ ’±À ̆±fl¡¬Û±Ó¬ fl¡ø1ÀÂ√o &amp;1n∏¬Û√&#xD;
Œ‰¬ÃÒ≈1œ1 ë ̃± ̊ ̨±¬ıœ  ̃±Ú≈ ̋√ Ê√Úí ¢∂LöÓ¬ 1±ˆ¬±1 ¬ı...øMêQ1 ’±À ̆±‰¬Ú± Œ¬Û±a±  ̊± ̊ ̨o øÓ¬ ̆fl¡ √± ̧1&#xD;
ëø¬ı ̄∏≈û 1±ˆ¬± ¤øÓ¬ ̊ ̨± øfl¡ ̃±Ú 1±øÓ¬í, ëø¬ı ̄∏≈û 1±ˆ¬± ¬Û≈Ú1 ’±ø ̋√√¬ı Î◊¬ˆ¬øÓ¬í, ’±1n∏ ëfl¡ ̆±&amp;1n∏ ø¬ı ̄∏≈û1±ˆ¬±í&#xD;
¢∂LöÀfl¡ ̋◊‡ÚÓ¬ 1±ˆ¬±1 ø¬ı ̄∏À ̊ ̨ øfl¡Â≈√ Ó¬Ô... Œ¬Û±a±  ̊± ̊ ̨o Œ√À¬ıfÚ±Ô ¬ı1±1 ëø¬ı ̄∏≈û 1±ˆ¬±1  ̧—¢∂± ̃œ&#xD;
’±ˆ¬±íÓ¬ 1±ˆ¬±1 Ê√œaÚ1 Œfl¡Ó¬À¬ı±1 ’Ê√±Ú± Ó¬Ô... õ∂fl¡±ø ̇Ó¬ ∆ ̋√√ÀÂ√o  ̇ ̇œ  ̇ ̃«±1 ëø¬ıù ́Àõ∂ ̃œ ø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√&#xD;
1±ˆ¬±í, Œ ̃± ̋√√Ú ̆± ̆  ̃≈‡±Ê√«œ1 ëø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√ 1±ˆ¬±íÓ¬ 1±ˆ¬±1 Ê√œaÚœ õ∂fl¡± ̇ ¬Û± ̋◊ÀÂ√o  ̋◊Â√ ̃± ̋◊ ̆&#xD;
Œ ̋√√±ÀÂ√ ̋◊Ú1 ëø¬ı ̄∏ûõ∂ ̧±√ 1±ˆ¬±1 Ê√œaÚ ’±1n∏ √ ̇«Úí ’±1n∏ ëø¬ı ̄∏≈ûõ∂ ̧±√ 1±ˆ¬±í ¢∂Lö‡ÚÓ¬ 1±ˆ¬±1&#xD;
Ê√œaÚ ’±1n∏ ¬ı...øMê√Q1 ø¬ıøˆ¬iß ø√ ̇ õ∂fl¡± ̇ ¬Û± ̋◊√ ÀÂ√o ŒÓ¬±À ̄∏ù ́1 Œ‰¬øÓ¬ ̊ ̨±1 ëø¬ıõ≠aœ ø ̇äÓ¬N1&#xD;
’±ˆ¬± ̄∏í Ú± ̃1 ¢∂Lö‡ÚÓ¬ ø ̆‡Àfl¡ õ∂·øÓ¬ ̇œ ̆  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...  ̧•§gœ ̊ ̨ ø¬ı ̄∏ ̊ ̨fl¡ ’±À ̆±‰¬Ú± fl¡ø1ÀÂ√ ’±1n∏&#xD;
 ̆·ÀÓ¬  ̧ ̃±Ê√Ó¬±øLafl¡  ̧ ̃±Ê√ ¬ı...a¶ö±1 ›¬Û1Ó¬ ’±À ̆±fl¡¬Û±Ó¬ fl¡ø1ÀÂ√o&#xD;
¬Û”¬ı«fl‘¡Ó¬ ’Ò... ̊ ̨Ú  ̧ ̃œé¬±Ó¬ ø¬ı ̄≈û 1±ˆ¬±1 Ê√œaÚ, fl¡ ̃«, ¬ı...øMê√Q,  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...,  ̧±—¶‘®øÓ¬fl¡&#xD;
Œ‰¬Ó¬Ú±, ˆ¬±¬ı-ˆ¬± ̄∏± ’±ø√ ø¬ıøˆ¬iß ø¬ı ̄∏ ̊ ̨Ó¬ ’±À ̆±fl¡ ̧g±Úœ øfl¡Â≈√ø‡øÚ ¢∂Lö1  ̧Ày√ Œ¬Û±a± ∆·ÀÂ√&#xD;
 ̊ø√› 1±ˆ¬±1 Ê√œaÚ ’±1n∏  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...Ó¬  ̃±'«¬ı±√œ √ ̇«Ú1 õ∂ˆ¬±a  ̧•Ûfl«¡œ ̊ ̨ Œfl¡±ÀÚ±Ò1Ì1 ¬Û”Ì«±—·&#xD;
¢∂Lö Œ¬Û±a± Œ ̋√√±a± Ú± ̋◊√ o ’±Ò≈øÚfl¡ õ∂ ̊≈øMê√1 Ú¬ı... Î¬◊¬Û±√±Ú ŒÙ¬‰¬¬ı≈fl¡1 ¬Û±Ó¬Ó¬ Î¬◊¬Û ̆t ø¬ıøˆ¬iß&#xD;
 ̧±ø ̋√√øÓ¬...fl¡ Œ·±È¬ Œ ̊ÀÚñ ’ ̧ ̃œ ̊ ̨±Ó¬ fl¡Ô±-¬ıÓ¬1±,  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬... ‰¬1±, ¢∂Lö  ̧≈¬ı± ̧, øfl¡Ó¬±¬Û,  ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...&#xD;
Î¬È¬, Ó¬fl«¡ ’±ø√À1±  ̧ ̃À ̊ ̨  ̧ ̃À ̊ ̨ ø¬ı ̄≈û 1±ˆ¬±1 Ê√œaÚ ’±1n∏ fl¡ ̃«  ̧•ÛÀfl«¡ fl¡1± ‰¬ ̃≈ ’±À ̆±‰¬Ú±&#xD;
Œ¬Û±a±  ̊± ̊ ̨o&#xD;
0.6·Àa ̄∏Ì±1 õ∂À ̃ ̊ ̨ –&#xD;
1o fl¡± ̆«  ̃±'«, Œ ̆øÚÚ, Œ©Üø ̆Ú,  ̃±›-Œ‰¬-Ó≈¬„√√ ’±ø√1 õ∂ˆ¬±Àa ø¬ı ̄∏≈û 1±ˆ¬±fl¡ øfl¡√À1&#xD;
õ∂ˆ¬±a±øi§Ó¬ fl¡ø1øÂ√ ̆ ’±1n∏ Œ ̧ ̋◊ õ∂ˆ¬±afl¡ ŒÓ¬›“ øfl¡√À1 Ê√±Ó¬œ ̊ ̨  ̃≈øMê  ̧—¢∂± ̃1 ’¶a&#xD;
ø ̋√√‰¬±À¬Û ¬ı...a ̋√√±1 fl¡ø1øÂ√ ̆ Œ ̧ ̋◊ Ó¬Ô... Œ¬Û± ̋√√1Õ ̆ ’Ú±o&#xD;
2o  ̧ ̇¶a  ̧—¢∂± ̃1 Ò±1Ì± ̋◊ 1±ˆ¬±1 ¬ı...øMê·Ó¬ Ê√œaÚ √ ̇«ÚÓ¬ Œ¬ÛÀ ̆±a± õ∂ˆ¬±a ’±1n∏&#xD;
 ̧±ø ̋√√Ó¬...  ̧ ̃¢∂1  ̃±ÀÊ√À1 Ó¬±1 õ∂øÓ¬Ù¬ ̆Ú øfl¡√À1 ¬Ûø1¶£≈¬È¬ ∆ ̋√√øÂ√ ̆ Œ ̧ ̋◊ ø¬ı ̄∏À ̊ ̨&#xD;
’Ò... ̊ ̨Ú fl¡1±o&#xD;
3o õ∂±flƒ¡ ¶§±ÒœÚ ’±1n∏ ¶§±ÒœÀÚ±M√√ 1 fl¡± ̆Ó¬ 1±ˆ¬±1  ̧—¢∂± ̃œ  ̧M√√ ±1 ¬Ûø1aÓ¬«Ú ̇œ ̆&#xD;
 ̃±Úø ̧fl¡Ó¬±  ̧•ÛÀfl¡« ’Ò... ̊ ̨Ú fl¡1±o</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A STUDY ON THE APPLICATIONS OF IMPRECISE NUMBERS</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/520" />
    <author>
      <name>Borgoyary, Sahalad</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/520</id>
    <updated>2026-05-25T05:02:50Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: A STUDY ON THE APPLICATIONS OF IMPRECISE NUMBERS
Authors: Borgoyary, Sahalad
Abstract: ABSTRACT&#xD;
Our investigation in the thesis entitled “A STUDY ON THE APPLICATIONS OF&#xD;
IMPRECISE NUMBERS” consists of eight chapters.&#xD;
Chapter 1 is introductory in nature to discuss the basic and the brief history regarding&#xD;
the development of imprecise numbers. Motivation and the investigation of imprecise&#xD;
numbers presented in the later chapter are described in the light with related work of&#xD;
other authors. Definition of the imprecise number used in the later chapter from the&#xD;
earlier author is presented in the preliminary section.&#xD;
In Chapter 2 entitled “A Few Applications of One-dimensional Imprecise Numbers”,&#xD;
we have discussed the properties of one-dimensional imprecise number occurred under&#xD;
intersection and union operation. Properties are collected from the classical set theory to&#xD;
declare the imprecise numbers has the similar character with the classical set which can&#xD;
represent all membership element lies between 0 and 1 in a single set.&#xD;
If an imprecise number N = [α, β, γ] is associated with a presence level indicator&#xD;
function,&#xD;
ρ 1 (x),&#xD;
ρ X (x) = { ρ 2 (x),&#xD;
0,&#xD;
when α ≤ x ≤ β&#xD;
when β ≤ x ≤ γ&#xD;
otherwise&#xD;
With a constant reference function 0 in the entire real line such that ρ 1 (x) is continuous&#xD;
and non-decreasing in the interval [α, β] and ρ 2 (x) is a continuous and non-increasing&#xD;
in the interval [β, γ].&#xD;
Case I: If ρ 1 (α) = ρ 2 (γ) = 0 and ρ 1 (β) ≠ ρ 2 (β), then we call it subnormal imprecise&#xD;
number.&#xD;
Case II: If ρ 1 (α) = μ 2 (γ) = 0 and ρ 1 (β) = ρ 2 (β) = 1, then we call it normal&#xD;
imprecise number.&#xD;
Each element of the classical matrix is expressed in the form of the imprecise number to&#xD;
obtain imprecise matrix. Thus, matrix related problems with complexity in nature are&#xD;
represented in the imprecise matrix in this chapter so that their decomposition and&#xD;
separation behaviors can be studied with different imprecise matrix properties.&#xD;
Properties of imprecise matrix occurred under Arithmetic operations of addition and&#xD;
subtraction are used to solve some of the complex transportation problems.&#xD;
vIn Chapter 3, we have represented the two-dimensional complex problems in the two-&#xD;
dimensional imprecise numbers. Properties of the classical theory under the operation of&#xD;
intersection and unions are proposed in the two-dimensional imprecise numbers to&#xD;
declare that the two-dimensional imprecise numbers can be extendable from one-&#xD;
dimensional imprecise numbers having a similar character with classical set theory and&#xD;
are proved with examples. Two-dimensional imprecise numbers model is introduced to&#xD;
solve the two variables containing complex economic problems at the end of this&#xD;
chapter.&#xD;
In chapter 4 entitled “Three-dimensional imprecise numbers and its applications”, we&#xD;
have represented three-dimensional complex problems into three-dimensional imprecise&#xD;
numbers. Properties of three-dimensional imprecise numbers under the operations of&#xD;
union and intersection occurred in classical set theory are discussed with examples. For&#xD;
this reason, the structure of union and intersection of the three-dimensional numbers is&#xD;
represented with own notation in section 4.3. of this chapter. To discuss the complex&#xD;
problems of three variables a three-dimensional imprecise number model is introduced&#xD;
at the end of this chapter.&#xD;
In Chapter 5 entitled “Introduction of N th dimensional Imprecise Numbers”, we have&#xD;
introduced the definition of N th dimensional imprecise numbers with notation. Structure&#xD;
of intersection and the union is defined with maximum and minimum operators to study&#xD;
the properties of N th dimensional imprecise numbers.&#xD;
In chapter 6 entitled “Construction of Normal Imprecise Function”, we have used the&#xD;
definition of imprecise number to obtain an imprecise function. To be an imprecise&#xD;
function we must have some basic properties and are proposed at the beginning of this&#xD;
chapter. Any function can be transformed into an imprecise function form with the help&#xD;
of multiplication factors and are discussed in other section of this chapter. The condition&#xD;
for the rate of convergence of imprecise function properties is discussed for the different&#xD;
imprecise functions. It is a value for which an imprecise function is optimally applicable&#xD;
in a particular place.&#xD;
In chapter 7 entitled, “Rate of Convergence of the Sine Imprecise Function”, we have&#xD;
discussed the method for construction of sine imprecise function from the general&#xD;
function. For this reason, a polynomial of degree one, two and the exponential functions&#xD;
viare considered in this chapter. A particular data collection of points is considered as an&#xD;
example for the construction of sine imprecise function. Conversion point of the various&#xD;
sine imprecise functions is also discussed. Using imprecise numbers definition, the area&#xD;
formula of sine imprecise function is expressed in the summation form.&#xD;
In general y ∗ = (c 0 + c 1 x + c 2 x 2 + c 3 x 3 + ⋯ ... . . +c n x n ) sin(lx) ; lεZ is a sine&#xD;
imprecise function.&#xD;
Depending on the value of “n” and “l”, we wet different sine imprecise functions. For&#xD;
this reason, we get different graphs having different conversion points and different area&#xD;
formulae of sine imprecise functions.&#xD;
In chapter 8, we have discussed the method for construction of cosine imprecise&#xD;
function from the general function. For this study, a polynomial function of degree one&#xD;
and two are considered in the chapter. The cosine function is used as a multiplier to&#xD;
obtain cosine imprecise function. A particular data collection of points is considered as&#xD;
an example for the construction of different cosine imprecise function. Conversion&#xD;
points of the various cosine imprecise functions are also discussed. Using imprecise&#xD;
numbers as the limits of integration the area formula of cosine imprecise function is&#xD;
obtained in the summation form.&#xD;
In general y ∗ = (c 0 + c 1 x + c 2 x 2 + c 3 x 3 + ⋯ ... . . +c n x n ) cos(lx) ; lεZ is a cosine&#xD;
imprecise function.&#xD;
Depending on the value of “n” and “l” we get different cosine imprecise functions. For&#xD;
this matter, we get different graphs to have different conversion points with different&#xD;
cosine imprecise functions formulae.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BODO TRIBAL OUT-MIGRANT YOUTH WORKERS AND LEFT- BEHIND PARENTS: STUDY OF FOREST VILLAGES OF KOKRAJHAR DISTRICT, ASSAM (INDIA)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/519" />
    <author>
      <name>MUSHAHARY, GWMSATH</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/519</id>
    <updated>2026-05-22T09:40:19Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: BODO TRIBAL OUT-MIGRANT YOUTH WORKERS AND LEFT- BEHIND PARENTS: STUDY OF FOREST VILLAGES OF KOKRAJHAR DISTRICT, ASSAM (INDIA)
Authors: MUSHAHARY, GWMSATH
Abstract: Abstract&#xD;
Migration is a vital component of population dynamics (Lundquist et al., 2015), shaped by a&#xD;
range of socioeconomic, cultural, and demographic factors (Bhende &amp; Kanitkar, 2003).&#xD;
Migration is largely driven by structural inequalities, income disparities, limited employment&#xD;
opportunities, and uneven access to public services (Parida &amp; Raman, 2020). These patterns&#xD;
are particularly pronounced among marginalized and socially excluded groups, for whom&#xD;
migration becomes a key livelihood strategy. Kokrajhar is one of the most socioeconomically&#xD;
backward districts in Assam and India (Govt. of Assam, 2014). A substantial majority (93.8%)&#xD;
of the population resides in rural areas, associated with a low literacy rate, low sex ratio, and&#xD;
high non-worker population. The district has a Schedule Tribe population of 31.4%, which is&#xD;
significantly higher than the state average of 12.4%. It is predominantly inhabited by the Bodo&#xD;
tribe, along with other groups such as the Rabha and Garo. Geographical isolation, poor&#xD;
infrastructure, ethnic conflicts, and limited access to formal employment have hindered the&#xD;
district’s development. Ethnic tensions, including the Bodo-Santhali conflicts (1996, 1998, and&#xD;
2014) and the Bodo-Muslim conflicts (1993, 2008, and 2012), have further exacerbated&#xD;
instability in the region. As a result, people from such areas migrate to other parts of the country&#xD;
in search of better opportunities. Despite this, studies focusing on post-conflict areas,&#xD;
particularly concerning the Bodo tribe, remain scarce. Therefore, the present study is based on&#xD;
the following objectives:&#xD;
(i) To know the causes and process of Bodo tribal youth Out-migration from Forest&#xD;
Villages of Kokrajhar district of Assam, from Left-Behind Parents (LBPs),&#xD;
(ii) To know the magnitude of remittances and the pattern of their utilisation by Left-Behind&#xD;
Parents (LBPs) and economic change at the place of origin,&#xD;
(iii) To understand the parents’ attitudes towards migration, expectations from the out-&#xD;
migrant children, and the nature of communications,&#xD;
(iv) To assess the psychosocial stress among the Left-Behind Parents (LBPs) due to the out-&#xD;
migration of their children.&#xD;
For this study, households are classified as either migrant or non-migrant. Each household must&#xD;
include at least one parent and one youth aged 18–29 years. Migrant households are defined as&#xD;
those with at least one youth engaged in labour outside the district for six months or more. In&#xD;
cases with multiple migrants, data were collected from the individual with the longest duration&#xD;
of stay at the destination. From each selected household, whether migrant or non-migrant,either the father or the mother was randomly chosen as the respondent based on availability&#xD;
and willingness. In cases of absence or refusal, the next eligible household was selected.&#xD;
Fieldwork was conducted between March and July 2023 across 33 of the most socio-&#xD;
economically backward forest villages (out of 66) in the study area. The total sample comprised&#xD;
462 households, with half of the respondents drawn from non-migrant households. A semi-&#xD;
structured interview schedule (including both closed- and open-ended questions) was used to&#xD;
collect data, accompanied by in-depth interviews, observations, and focus group discussions.&#xD;
The General Health Questionnaire-28 was also employed to assess psychosocial well-being.&#xD;
Communication with respondents was conducted in the Bodo language to ensure accurate and&#xD;
comprehensive data collection. A mixed-methods approach, combining both qualitative and&#xD;
quantitative techniques, was adopted. Data were analyzed using SPSS-25, employing&#xD;
descriptive statistics (frequency, mean, standard deviation), chi-square tests, and logistic&#xD;
regression analysis.&#xD;
The study shows a clear gendered migration pattern, where almost all youth migrants are male.&#xD;
Migrants were typically older (mean age: 25.2 years), less educated, more likely to be married,&#xD;
and primarily engaged in manual labor. They came from households with larger family sizes,&#xD;
smaller landholdings (average: 5.4 bighas), lower incomes (INR 29,601), greater reliance on&#xD;
wage labor and forest resources, and higher levels of food insecurity. LBPs were predominantly&#xD;
older, less educated (80.1% illiterate), more often female and widowed/divorced, and more&#xD;
dependent on wage labor compared to non-migrant households. Migration decisions were&#xD;
influenced by age, education, marital status, earnings, occupation, and social networks.&#xD;
Younger migrants were more likely to migrate independently, while older and married migrants&#xD;
were often influenced by peers. Less educated migrants relied on friends for inspiration, and&#xD;
about one-third of them migrated to South India.&#xD;
Migration was primarily driven by push factors such as small landholdings (18.4%), poverty&#xD;
(15.2%), low and irregular wages (14.3%), large family burdens (12.2%), and debt (7.6%).&#xD;
Focus group discussions (FGDs) and interviews revealed that the collapse of traditional&#xD;
livelihoods, local unemployment, and peer influence from returning migrants also played&#xD;
significant roles. Remittance behavior was closely linked to age and marital status, with older&#xD;
migrants (aged ≥23 years) and married individuals remitting more due to greater family&#xD;
responsibilities. While 35.4% remitted regularly, many lacked savings due to financial&#xD;
pressures. Remittances were primarily used for daily needs, debt repayment, healthcare, andeducation. Destination choice was influenced by wage prospects and social networks, with&#xD;
Bangalore being the most preferred location. Social ties remained strong, 54.5% migrated with&#xD;
friends, and 51.9% maintained contact with them at their destinations. However, 61.9% had&#xD;
only occasional contact with their families, and 35.9% had not returned home since they&#xD;
migrated. The study finds that remittance behavior among Bodo tribal youth migrants is shaped&#xD;
by both individual and household-level factors. Migrants with education below Class IX had&#xD;
the highest remittance rates (93.61%) and remitted more regularly, reflecting greater household&#xD;
dependency. In contrast, those educated above Class X showed slightly lower remittance rates&#xD;
(85.71%) despite earning more.&#xD;
Migration to South India resulted in the highest average remittance levels (INR 31,068.97),&#xD;
supported by better job opportunities. A longer duration of stay (over three years) is also&#xD;
correlated with higher and more consistent remittances (INR 35,010.20). Income strongly&#xD;
influenced remittance amounts; migrants earning above INR 20,000 remitted the most (INR&#xD;
33,474.58), although lower-income migrants tended to remit more consistently. Married&#xD;
migrants remitted both more frequently and in larger amounts (INR 35,078.95), driven by&#xD;
increased familial responsibilities. Savings behavior showed a modest inverse relationship&#xD;
with remittance frequency and volume, as migrants without savings remitted more frequently&#xD;
and in slightly higher amounts (INR 27,957.03), prioritizing household needs over savings.&#xD;
Regular communication and home visits were linked to higher remittance regularity and&#xD;
volume, highlighting the role of emotional ties. Migrants whose spouses managed remittances&#xD;
sent the highest amounts (INR 35,512.66), indicating strong financial interdependence. At the&#xD;
household level, Hindu families received slightly higher remittances (INR 28,029.85) and had&#xD;
a greater receipt rate (90.27%) compared to Christian households. Larger households (≥5&#xD;
members) and land-poor families (≤5 bighas) received higher remittances (INR 29,405.30),&#xD;
reflecting greater dependency and limited local income sources.&#xD;
Household income, debt status, and lack of government support emerged as key determinants&#xD;
of remittance inflows. Low-income households (≤INR 20,000) received the highest remittances&#xD;
(INR 35,242.42), highlighting the compensatory role of remittances in poor settings. Indebted&#xD;
households (INR 31,336.63) and those not covered by welfare schemes (INR 28,714.29) also&#xD;
received higher remittances, underscoring migration as a crucial livelihood strategy in the&#xD;
absence of institutional support. Households engaged in agriculture and those with inadequate&#xD;
production reported higher remittances than those reliant on wage labour or small businesses.However, remittance volume did not increase proportionately with the number of migrants per&#xD;
household.&#xD;
Remittances were primarily used for daily needs, followed by house repairs, debt repayment,&#xD;
healthcare, and education. Poorer and small landholding households prioritized essentials such&#xD;
as food and education, while higher and regular remittances supported more strategic spending&#xD;
on debt repayment and healthcare. Usage also varied by recipient, with spouses allocating more&#xD;
towards basic needs and education. Remittances improved the quality of life for 48.5% of&#xD;
households, particularly in areas such as housing, food, education, and health. However, many&#xD;
households reported no significant change, underscoring the coping-oriented nature of&#xD;
remittances. In agrarian households, women's workload increased due to the migration of male&#xD;
youth. LBPs played key roles in household decision-making, often jointly with spouses or&#xD;
daughters-in-law.&#xD;
The emotional well-being of LBPs was significantly influenced by gender, age, health status,&#xD;
income, family size, remittance regularity, and frequency of communication. Higher levels of&#xD;
distress were reported among female, older, low-income LBPs, those in larger families, and&#xD;
those with irregular contact with their migrant children. Notably, LBPs without common&#xD;
illnesses exhibited higher emotional distress, possibly due to unmet expectations. Expectations&#xD;
related to remittances, care, co-residence, and return varied according to the migrant’s age,&#xD;
marital status, education, income, and destination. LBPs of younger, unmarried, well-educated,&#xD;
and higher-earning migrants, especially those working in South India, held stronger&#xD;
expectations. Similarly, female, married, and illiterate LBPs, particularly cultivators and&#xD;
housewives, showed greater emotional and financial dependence on migrants.&#xD;
Sick LBPs reported higher needs for care (83.58%) and remittances (87.69%), while those&#xD;
living alone or only with a spouse expressed stronger desires for co-residence (65.21%) and&#xD;
the return of their children (52.17%). These findings underscore the multidimensional nature&#xD;
of LBP experiences in the context of youth migration. Visitation and communication patterns&#xD;
between migrants and LBPs varied notably based on both migrant and LBP characteristics.&#xD;
Older (≥23 years) and married migrants, those in frequent contact with their spouses, and&#xD;
regular or high remitters (INR 30,001 and above) were more likely to visit home and maintain&#xD;
consistent communication. Migrants in South India showed higher visitation rates (29.50%)&#xD;
than those in the Northeast (24.52%). Interestingly, higher education levels among migrants&#xD;
were associated with fewer visits, possibly due to greater job demands.Migrant age, marital status, duration of stay, and destination positively influenced contact&#xD;
frequency, with longer stays and migration to South India linked to better communication.&#xD;
Regular remitters and frequent visitors demonstrated stronger emotional ties with their&#xD;
families. Among LBPs, females, older individuals, and the illiterate received more visits, likely&#xD;
due to their perceived vulnerability. Wage laborers showed more balanced visitation patterns.&#xD;
However, LBPs suffering from illnesses received fewer visits and had less regular contact,&#xD;
highlighting how health status can influence the level of support received from migrant&#xD;
children.&#xD;
Psychological distress among LBPs was widespread, with 78.47% reporting symptoms&#xD;
according to the GHQ-28 scale. Distress was notably higher among those aged above 50 years,&#xD;
widowed or divorced (89.28%), illiterate, chronically ill, engaged in wage labor, from larger&#xD;
families, and low-income households (earning less than INR 20,000 annually). Surprisingly,&#xD;
higher remittances (above INR 30,000) and regular contact with migrant children were&#xD;
associated with greater distress, possibly due to prolonged separation or increased emotional&#xD;
burden. In contrast, LBPs who had no contact with their children reported lower distress levels&#xD;
(33.33%), suggesting that ignorance may, paradoxically, reduce anxiety. Distress was also&#xD;
slightly higher among those living with extended family, recipients of welfare schemes&#xD;
(81.75%), and even among debt-free households, indicating deeper vulnerabilities beyond&#xD;
financial indicators. Youth migration among Bodo tribal communities remains a critical&#xD;
economic survival strategy, yet it imposes significant psychosocial costs on left-behind&#xD;
families. While remittances provide financial support, they do not alleviate emotional suffering,&#xD;
particularly among female caregivers. These findings underscore the urgent need for integrated&#xD;
policy interventions that enhance rural livelihoods, expand welfare coverage, and offer&#xD;
psychosocial support.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>EFFECT OF PARENTING STYLE AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS ON ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT OF HIGHER SECONDARY STUDENTS IN UDALGURI DISTRICT, ASSAM</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/518" />
    <author>
      <name>Basumatary, Ansumwi</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/518</id>
    <updated>2026-05-22T09:35:46Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: EFFECT OF PARENTING STYLE AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS ON ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT OF HIGHER SECONDARY STUDENTS IN UDALGURI DISTRICT, ASSAM
Authors: Basumatary, Ansumwi
Abstract: Abstract&#xD;
A nation’s progress and prosperity depend upon its educational system. Education is a&#xD;
designed process which refers to the attainment of knowledge and promotes the&#xD;
harmonious progress of a person. The fundamental meaning of education is the all-&#xD;
round improvement of human being. Education helps to unfold the inborn qualities of&#xD;
children and develop their personality fully in respect of physical, mental, intellectual,&#xD;
emotional, aesthetic and spiritual. It endures through various stages throughout the&#xD;
course of evolution.&#xD;
Academic achievement serves as an important dimension to measure the educational&#xD;
development. Since the students are the future of tomorrow their academic excellence is&#xD;
imperative for shaping their future. Good education prepares students for future careers,&#xD;
is linked to positive outcomes and is a main criterion to measure one’s total&#xD;
potentialities and capabilities. Examination is a vital tool for measuring students’&#xD;
academic achievement. It enables to assess the students’ performance academically in&#xD;
the formal education system. The higher secondary students’ academic achievement in&#xD;
class XII board examination affects their future choices for higher studies and careers.&#xD;
Therefore, the higher secondary education stage is crucial as it prepares adolescent boys&#xD;
and girls for their future professions. Several factors affect the academic achievement&#xD;
like attitude, classroom environment, role of parents, social circle, psychological and&#xD;
health-related factors, guidance and counselling services and so on. Among these,&#xD;
parenting styles and socio-economic status are two important factors essential for&#xD;
students to fulfil their dreams and to compete with the world. Thus, the researcher&#xD;
aimed to study the effect of parenting styles and socio-economic status on the academic&#xD;
achievement of higher secondary students in Udalguri district.&#xD;
The present study intends to achieve the following objectives:&#xD;
1. To examine the academic achievement of higher secondary students of Udalguri&#xD;
district (from 2011-2020).&#xD;
2. To find out the parenting styles of parents of higher secondary students.&#xD;
3. To determine the relationship between parenting styles and academic&#xD;
achievement of higher secondary students.&#xD;
14. To find out the socio-economic status of parents of higher secondary students.&#xD;
5. To determine the relationship between socio-economic status and academic&#xD;
achievement of higher secondary students.&#xD;
On the basis, of the objectives framed two null hypotheses are formulated to study the&#xD;
connection among academic achievement, parenting styles and socio-economic status.&#xD;
The study is delimited to students who passed the higher secondary final examination in&#xD;
the year, 2020 from Arts stream under AHSEC Board in Udalguri district only.&#xD;
The present study followed the descriptive survey method. For sample selection the&#xD;
investigator used a census sampling technique to select the degree colleges and a&#xD;
proportionate stratified random sampling technique to select the students. A sample of&#xD;
770 students, consisting of 240 students from private colleges and 530 students from&#xD;
government colleges, was drawn, i.e., by taking 30% from private and government&#xD;
colleges from the total population of 2567 students using the proportionate stratified&#xD;
random sampling method. The study is based on both Primary and Secondary sources of&#xD;
data. Two standardised tools are used to study the parenting styles and socio-economic&#xD;
status. The collected data are tabulated by using statistical methods like- percentage and&#xD;
coefficient of correlation (Pearson’s Product Moment Method).&#xD;
Objective No 1: To examine the academic achievement of higher&#xD;
secondary students of Udalguri district (from 2011-2020)&#xD;
Under this objective the investigator observed the district-wise higher secondary final&#xD;
examination performance in Assam and the performance of Udalguri district from the&#xD;
year 2011 to 2020. The investigator also examined the level of academic achievement of&#xD;
the sample students based on the marks obtained by the students in higher secondary&#xD;
final examination.&#xD;
From the findings, it may be asserted that the performance of Udalguri district in the&#xD;
higher secondary final examination from the year 2011 to 2020 is not satisfactory. The&#xD;
pass percentage is low as compared to other districts in the state-level result.&#xD;
Concerning the district-wise data, in 2020, Udalguri district stands at 24 th position out of&#xD;
33 districts of Assam and 3 rd position in Bodoland Territorial Area Districts (BTAD)&#xD;
2based on the students’ performance in higher secondary final examination. A large&#xD;
number of students have appeared in the examination, but only a small number have&#xD;
passed. According to the data, the majority of the students in Udalguri district are&#xD;
‘Average Achievers’ due to few number of students passing in first division and&#xD;
maximum students pass in the third division.&#xD;
The result addressing the level of academic achievement of students taken as sample&#xD;
indicates that students have an average level of academic achievement. The findings&#xD;
suggest that majority (47.92%) of the students are ‘Average’ achievers. This result can&#xD;
be interpreted that majority of the student’s academic achievement is a matter of&#xD;
concern, as only 25.45% are classified as high achievers. Further, the finding indicates&#xD;
that males have outperformed the female students. Thus, it is essential to draw the&#xD;
attention of concerned authorities in order to provide better strategies for students’ high&#xD;
academic achievement.&#xD;
Objective No 2: To find out the parenting styles of parents of higher&#xD;
secondary students&#xD;
This objective observed the level of different parenting styles of parents of higher&#xD;
secondary students. In case of democratic parenting style, majority (34.03%) of the&#xD;
students indicated that their parents used democratic parenting and their response falls&#xD;
in the ‘Extremely High’ level. The result indicated that among different styles of&#xD;
parenting, the democratic parenting style was deemed the most predominant. Parents&#xD;
who are democratic are more responsive and listen to their children, are more forgiving&#xD;
and nurturing rather than punishing. In terms of autocratic parenting, majority (30.26%)&#xD;
of the responses fell into the ‘Above Average’ group. According to the results,&#xD;
autocratic parenting emerged as the second most popular parenting among the parents.&#xD;
Students who perceived their parents as autocratic conveyed through their responses&#xD;
that they are expected to obey their parents without questioning, perform better than&#xD;
others, and their parents command them what to do and what not to do, compel them to&#xD;
follow rules and discipline. The results on permissive parenting revealed that, majority&#xD;
(23.25%) of the students’ response fall into the ‘Below Average’ group. This parenting&#xD;
style advocates for giving children complete freedom, fulfilling their every desire&#xD;
3whether good or bad, and appreciating their children’s behaviour, regardless of how&#xD;
they behave. In this parenting style, parents often struggle to discipline their children&#xD;
and feel guilty about refusing them. According to analysis on uninvolved parenting, the&#xD;
majority (26.88%) of students’ replies fall into the ‘Extremely Low’ group. This style is&#xD;
hardly adopted by parents in the upbringing of their children. Uninvolved parents have a&#xD;
careless and neglectful attitude towards their children. They are unconcerned about their&#xD;
children’s wants and expectations, hardly remember important things of their children,&#xD;
and are too busy to respond to their children. Furthermore, uninvolved parents are often&#xD;
unaware of their children’s studies and academic performance; in other cases, they have&#xD;
no idea what grades their children receive in class.&#xD;
Objective No 3: To determine the relationship between parenting styles&#xD;
and academic achievement of higher secondary students&#xD;
The result indicates that the relationship between parenting styles and academic&#xD;
achievement is statistically significant. The stated null hypothesis (H 01 )“There is no&#xD;
significant relationship between parenting styles and academic achievement of higher&#xD;
secondary students” fails to be accepted. A noteworthy correlation is observed between&#xD;
democratic parenting style and academic achievement, with a fairly positive level of&#xD;
correlation. The correlation between autocratic parenting style and academic&#xD;
achievement is found slightly significant and with low positive correlation. Significant,&#xD;
but weak correlation is found between permissive parenting style and academic&#xD;
achievement. A negative and insignificant correlation is observed between uninvolved&#xD;
parenting style and overall students’ academic achievement.&#xD;
Objective No 4: To find out the socio-economic status of parents of&#xD;
higher secondary students&#xD;
The result on the analysis of socio-economic status of parents of higher secondary&#xD;
students reveal that majority (38.83%) of the students’ falls on ‘Above Average’ socio-&#xD;
economic status level. The result reveals that maximum students come from ‘Above&#xD;
Average’ socio-economic backgrounds followed by ‘Average’ and ‘Below Average’&#xD;
families.&#xD;
4Objective No 5: To determine the relationship between socio-economic&#xD;
status and academic achievement of higher secondary students&#xD;
The result showed a positive and significant relationship between socio-economic status&#xD;
and academic achievement. The null hypothesis stating (H 02 ) “There is no significant&#xD;
relationship between socio-economic status and academic achievement of higher&#xD;
secondary students” fails to be accepted. Considering this finding, we can conclude that&#xD;
socio-economic status is an important and favourable predictor of academic&#xD;
achievement.&#xD;
Summary of the Study&#xD;
The findings of the present study conclude that academic achievement is significantly&#xD;
related to parenting styles and socio-economic status. The students’ academic&#xD;
achievement in Udalguri district is average. Thus, there is an imperative need to&#xD;
improve the academic achievement of students in Udalguri district. Parenting style and&#xD;
socio-economic status are two important factors associated with the academic&#xD;
achievement of students. Therefore, parents must be made aware of their contribution to&#xD;
children’s academic achievement as their parenting has significant impact on children’s&#xD;
development and upbringing. The Central and State Government should take steps to&#xD;
create more job opportunities to help people improve their financial condition and&#xD;
socio-economic position, as this is also an essential factor in student’s academic&#xD;
success. The investigator hopes that the present study will contribute to improving the&#xD;
academic achievement of students in the higher secondary stage, as well as create&#xD;
awareness among the educational authorities, state government, educators, teachers,&#xD;
parents, students and the general population at large.&#xD;
5</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

